Tag: 2013
May 22, 2024
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
SBO Declarations: A Significant Compliance Challenge
Through an order dated May 6, 2024, the Registrar of Companies (the "RoC") of NCT Delhi and Haryana imposed an order of penalty against Leixir Resources Private Limited ("Company") for non-compliance with the disclosure requirements mandated for significant beneficial ownership under Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the "Act"). ......
January 5, 2022
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
INDIA AND THE CAIRN ENERGY CONUNDRUM: IT’S A WRAP
Cairn Energy PLC (“Cairn Energy”), now renamed Capricorn Energy, is one of Europe’s leading independent oil and gas exploration and development companies. Over the last few years, the Government of India and Cairn Energy have been involved in a dispute related to a retrospective tax that was imposed on Cairn Energy by the Government of India. ......
August 4, 2021
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
NEW NORMS ON COMPANY NAMES TO TAKE EFFECT FROM SEPTEMBE...
On July 22, 2021, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs notified the Companies (Incorporation) Fifth Amendment Rules, 2021 (“Amendment”), thereby amending the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014 (“Rules”). The Amendment, has inserted a new Rule 33A (Allotment of a new name to the existing company under Section 16(3) of the Act) after Rule 33 under the Rules. ......
July 7, 2021
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
SPACs in the Indian context
In recent years, SPACs, or ‘Special Purpose Acquisition Companies’, have snaked their way into the lexicon of every investor worth its salt. SPACs are the shiniest new ‘instrument’ on the block and the numbers lend into the hype; for instance, 2020 witnessed the execution of a record 248 SPACs raising a collective USD 83 billion on NASDAQ , even as the world succumbed to a pandemic. Further, it is estimated that there are now close to 400 SPACs on the market with more than USD 120 Billion on their balance sheets. ... ...
January 7, 2020
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
Tata’s tata to Mistry? Not if the NCLAT has anyth...
Legacies, while the sturdiest, are often the most vulnerable to that harsh cousin of time, change. The battle royale being played out between Tata Sons and Cyrus Mistry, of the Shapoorji Pallonji Group, certainly seems to echo the thought, and is being closely monitored, as the outcome will set the way forward for one of the biggest conglomerates in India....
January 2, 2020
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
The Supreme Court on belated filing of Revised Returns ...
In a recent judgment delivered by Hon’ble Judge Indu Malhotra in the case of Dalmia Power Limited and Ors. Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1, Trichy[1], the Supreme Court of India ("Court") upheld the validity of filing of revised returns by an amalgamated company beyond the time limit prescribed under the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("IT Act")....
November 28, 2019
Corporate Law
Corporate Law
Related Party Transactions: How Close is too Close?
Related party transactions have once again found themselves the subject of public scrutiny due to occurrences at InterGlobe Aviation Limited ("Interglobe"), which runs and operates the low-cost airline Indigo. Interglobe has been facing stormy weather following a dispute between its promoters, Rakesh Gangwal and Rahul Bhatia. Since mid-2018 the feud between both promoters has snowballed into a very public feud. While there are several contentious issues on which the promoters disagree, one of the main reasons for their public fallout has been over related party transactions. In 2018, Rakesh Gangwal flagged and alleged that Interglobe has entered into related party transactions with several companies associated with Rahul Bhatia, a charge that the latter insists is mala fide. ...
November 21, 2019
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
Back to Books for Independent Directors
It is widely considered that independent directors on the board of a company would improve corporate governance, especially given the responsibility of the board to balance various interests. The reason for such belief stems from the opinion that the directors representing specific interests would be confined to the perspective dictated by those interests, whereas, an independent director could bring an element of objectivity to the decision making process of the board with regards to the general interests of the company and also protect minority shareholders ....
February 15, 2019
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
Corporate Law | General Corporate Advisory
Companies Act, 2013 – The Companies (Amendment) Ordinan...
The Companies (Amendment) Ordinance 2018 ("2018 Ordinance"), issued on November 2, 2018 brought about significant changes to certain provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 ("Act"). The 2018 Ordinance was passed by the Lok Sabha, though could not be taken up by the Rajya Sabha and which was due to expire on January 21, 2019. In order to give continuity to the amendments introduced by the 2018 Ordinance, it was re-promulgated on January 12, 2019 by another ordinance i.e. the Companies Amendment Ordinance 2019 ("Ordinance") on January 12, 2019 with its provisions effective from November 2, 2018....