Tag: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that effacement of trademarks from refurbished or resold goods would amount to impairment, even if international exhaustion is at play. However, resale may be valid and permissible if refurbished goods are offered for sale with full and proper disclosure, as per terms laid down by the court. ......

Businesses tend to prioritise securing their rights in their primary jurisdictions of operation, and / or jurisdictions that are strategically advantageous. This applies across all aspects of operation, whether it is incorporation, tax residency or even intellectual property (IP). The challenge with the latter is that some types of IP are jurisdiction-specific. ......

Patent laws, including in India, usually allow oppositions to be filed against patent applications, either before or after they are granted. Appeals against decisions in opposition matters may also be permitted in some cases. In India, an appeal against a decision of a Controller may be filed in post-grant oppositions, but the law is not as straightforward when it comes to appeals in pre-grant oppositions. ......

In a continuation of the long-drawn out big ticket litigation between PepsiCo and potato farmers, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in January 2024 reversed an earlier decision that had revoked the multinational’s registration of potato variety FL2027, which it uses to make the iconic Lays chips. ......

Among the many exclusions to patentability, the Indian Patents Act, 1970 (“the Act”) also excludes “diagnostic methods” under Section 3(i). But the term itself has been applied inconsistently by the Indian Patent Office (“IPO”). This note discusses a recent decision of the Madras High Court on the interpretation of this term and its implications on related patent applications. ......

A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court has brought much-required clarity on filing of divisional applications in India, which at least two different single judge benches of the same court had disagreed upon previously. ......

Recently, in the case of Vivek Khanna vs. OYO Apartments Investments LLP , the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("A&C Act"), by way of which, Mr. Vivek Khanna (the "Petitioner") assailed the award dated March 31, 2023 (the "Impugned Award") passed by the arbitral tribunal comprising of a sole arbitrator. ......

Recently, in the case of Amit Guglani and Another vs. L&T Housing Finance Limited and Another , the Delhi High Court adjudicated upon a petition filed under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the "A&C Act") for appointment of a sole arbitrator ("Petition") under a tripartite agreement dated October 24, 2018, executed between the parties. ......

When is a new product considered a mere discovery of something that subsists in nature and thus unpatentable, and when is it altogether new or unfamiliar, and thus, worthy of being granted a patent? This is the question that the Delhi High Court tackled in the recent case of Diamond Star Global SDN BHD v Joint Controller of Patents. ......